Condemnations and Appeals:Strong condemnation of far-right Hindu nationalist violence scapegoating Muslims for the attack.Demand for a neutral international investigation to ensure accountability.Reminder of India’s legal obligations under treaties like ICCPR, ICESCR, and ICERD to protect minorities.Urges the Indian government to end hate, protect civilians, and prosecute those responsible.Appeals to international actors (especially the UN) to monitor and intervene via special procedures.Rejection of India’s post-2019 actions in IOJK, including demographic changes, political repression, and denial of self-determination.Demands by IPHRC:Restore fundamental freedoms in IOJK.Release political prisoners and halt collective punishments.Allow UN and OIC access to IOJK.Hold a free and fair referendum under UN/OIC supervision.Normative Strength:The statement is anchored in binding human rights treaties (e.g., ICCPR Articles 2, 18, 26, 27).India's ratification of these makes the obligations legally binding under international law.Political Significance:Though not legally enforceable, it holds moral and diplomatic weight.Supports Pakistan’s stance and amplifies the issue in global forums like the UN Human Rights Council.Human Rights Advocacy:Calls for a UN fact-finding mission or Commission of Inquiry to document abuses.Emphasizes the need for international scrutiny and access to IOJK.